Cases 1 - 10 of 15
Carroll v. Pfizer Inc et al
as 3:2023cv20782
Plaintiff:
Mark M. Carroll
Defendant:
Pfizer Inc, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
KAHANE v. CARROLL
as 3:2020cv05156
Defendant:
M CARROLL
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J KAHANE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CARROLL v. BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY et al
as 3:2018cv00964
Plaintiff:
BESSIE M CARROLL
Defendant:
BRISTOL-MYERS SQUIBB COMPANY, OTSUKA PHARMACEUTICAL CO LTD and OTSUKA AMERICA PHARMACEUTICAL INC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Atkins v. Martin
as 4:2017cv00090
Plaintiff:
BOBBY RAY ATKINS and SHERRY ATKINS
Defendant:
DIANE M CARROLL and Georgia Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00178
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Karwel v. City of Palm Bay et al
as 6:2015cv00597
Plaintiff:
Sandra Kane Karwel
Defendant:
City of Palm Bay, Joseph Poteat, Sherry Poteat and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Carroll v. Colvin (CONSENT)
as 2:2015cv00084
Plaintiff:
Elma M. Carroll
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv03564
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Masonry Arts Inc v. All South Precast LLC et al
as 2:2013cv01381
Plaintiff:
Masonry Arts Inc
Defendant:
All South Precast LLC, Robert M Carroll, Charles Thomas Lancaster and others
Counter_claimant:
USF Insurance Company
Counter_defendant:
Masonry Arts Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Declaratory Judgemen
BROWN v. MCNEAL et al.
as 3:2012cv00257
Plaintiff:
DAVID ALAN BROWN
Defendant:
WALTER MCNEAL, VICTORIA LANGSFORD, LEVINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
