Cases 1 - 10 of 14
Roberts v. Blitch et al
as 3:2023cv01134
Plaintiff:
James Elton Roberts
Defendant:
William B. Blitch, Bayron, Captain Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Godhigh v. Centurion Medical Dep. et al
as 3:2023cv00695
Plaintiff:
Mario Godhigh
Defendant:
Centurion Medical Dep., Correction Officer Coleman and Correction Officer Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rudolph v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00867
Defendant:
Mrs. McCovery, T. Jones, D. Lovejoy and others
Plaintiff:
Travis Sentell Rudolph
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. McCoy et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00841
Defendant:
Mrs. McCovery, T. Jones, D. Lovejoy and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Owens, Jr. v. Myers et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv00301
Defendant:
Lt. Jones, Jennifer McCovery, Officer Coleman and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Dwayne Owens, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. Jackson et al
as 1:2018cv04738
Plaintiff:
Paul Richardson
Defendant:
Theodore "Ted" Jackson, P.A. Zanebee, Nurse Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Whitt v. Wilson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2018cv00848
Defendant:
Officer Spann, Ms. Wilson, Officer Drake and others
Plaintiff:
Heath Whitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Thompkins et al
as 2:2018cv00644
Plaintiff:
Matthew Bailey
Defendant:
Officer Coleman, Officer Kincey, Brian Thompkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James Fennie v. T. Padgett, et al
as 17-14777
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES W. FENNIE
Defendant - Appellee:
T. PADGETT, Unit Manager, Coleman USP I, J. VAUGHN, Case Manager, Coleman USP I, J. SHEFFIELD and others
Torres v. Gray et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2016cv00852
Plaintiff:
Kevin C. Torres
Defendant:
Ruby Gray, Officer Coleman, Officer Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
