Cases 1 - 10 of 2,813
ROBINSON v PFIZER INC et al
as 3:2025cv00250
Plaintiff:
LAKEISHA PARKER ROBINSON
Defendant:
PFIZER INC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN CO LLC, PHARMACIA & UPJOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BROWN v. BERNARD et al
as 1:2025cv00041
Plaintiff:
CHARLES A BROWN
Defendant:
TERRY BERNARD, MARCI PARKER and BOYLE MOULDER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parker v. Edmond et al
as 2:2025cv00328
Plaintiff:
Jarvis T Parker
Defendant:
A. Edmond, Devontay Jackson, L. Ellis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Franklin v. Warden et al
as 3:2025cv00228
Plaintiff:
Myron C. Franklin
Defendant:
Warden, Sgt. Parker, Ofc. Boucanon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker et al v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
as 2:2025cv00281
Plaintiff:
Mickey Parker and Barbara W. Parker
Defendant:
State Farm Fire and Casualty Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2025cv00393
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Parker v. Haygood et al
as 4:2025cv00214
Plaintiff:
Grace Parker
Defendant:
Peggy Haygood, Michael Haygood, Southside Utilities and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jackson v. Harris et al
as 2:2025cv00065
Plaintiff:
James Ira Jackson
Defendant:
Shevaun L. Harris, Kristen Kanner, Raven Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2025cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00625
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
