Cases 1 - 10 of 201
Grasso v. Jackson County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2018cv00105
Plaintiff:
Christian Sea Grasso
Defendant:
Jackson County Sheriff's Department and Jackson County Jail Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Barbour County Sheriff's Department (MAG+)
as 2:2018cv00602
Plaintiff:
Tommy Kendrick Williams
Defendant:
Barbour County Sheriff's Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dunbar v. Marion County Sheriff's Department (Jail)
as 5:2018cv00318
Plaintiff:
Carlton Dunbar
Defendant:
Marion County Sheriff's Department (Jail)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. County of Paulding, Georgia et al
as 4:2018cv00136
Plaintiff:
William Johnson
Defendant:
County of Paulding, Georgia, Board of Commissioners for Paulding County, Paulding County Sheriff's Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cox v. Geneva County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2018cv00258
Plaintiff:
Maurice Odell Cox
Defendant:
Geneva County Sheriff's Department, Tony Helms and Sheriff Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00543
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Nugent et al
as 8:2018cv01125
Plaintiff:
James Williams
Defendant:
Richard Nugent, Richard Condray, Manuel Zurita and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Hardy v. Corizon Health et al
as 1:2018cv01528
Plaintiff:
De'Andre Armhan Hardy
Defendant:
Corizon Health, Ted Jackson, Harpo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sagesse v. Bastedo et al
as 2:2018cv00225
Plaintiff:
Rones Sagesse
Defendant:
Jeffrey J. Bastedo, Joseph M. Clark, Gregory Ream and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MANN v. HEATH
as 7:2018cv00050
Plaintiff:
JOHN ALAN MANN, JR
Defendant:
ANTHONY HEATH, JEREMY MARQUEZ, KYLE LIGHTSEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
