Cases 1 - 9 of 9
SONDHI v. MCPHERSON OIL CO. et al
as 2:2021cv01537
Plaintiff:
MANOJ SONDHI
Defendant:
MCPHERSON OIL CO., THOMAS KARL BRIDGEWATER, JOHN DOES 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Brown v. Clayton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 1:2019cv02731
Defendant:
Clayton County Board of Commisioners, Clayton County Sheriff's Office, John Does 1-10 and others
Plaintiff:
Marlon Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Nolte v. Ford Motor Company et al
as 1:2017cv20818
Defendant:
FORD MOTOR COMPANY, ABC Corporation 1-10, Takata Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
NOLTE and Krystle Nolte
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Product Liability
Cepull v. Spalding County et al
as 3:2016cv00086
Plaintiff:
Justin Cepull
Defendant:
Spalding County , Spalding County Board of Commissioners , Rita Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EWC P&T, LLC v. Doe 1 d/b/a "EXQUISITEPRODUCTS2016" et al
as 0:2016cv60643
Plaintiff:
EWC P&T, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe 1, John Doe 2, John Doe 3 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Cepull v. Spalding County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2016cv00886
Plaintiff:
Justin Cepull
Defendant:
Spalding County Sheriff's Department , Wendell Beam , John Does 1-10 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Glock, Inc. v. The Wuster
as 1:2014cv00568
Defendant:
Kent De-Hui Wu, May-Fong Chu, Kent Wu and others
Plaintiff:
Glock, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
HAREL et al v. KGM INDUSTRIES CO., INC. et al
as 0:2012cv61669
Plaintiff:
YIGAL COHEN HAREL and INTEGRAL LOGISTICS, LLC
Defendant:
KGM INDUSTRIES CO., INC., JOHN DOES 1-10 and XYZ CORPORATIONS 1-10
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1126
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2008cv01830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
