Contract Cases filed in Washington matching "USA"
Cases 61 - 70 of 459,975
Williams v. Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05173
Plaintiff: Corissa Williams
Defendant: Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., L'Oreal USA, Inc., L'Oreal USA Products,Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Holland v. Avlon Industries, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv05174
Plaintiff: Irene Ladell Holland
Defendant: Avlon Industries, Inc., Beauty Bell Enterprises, LLC f/k/a House of Cheatham, Inc., Godrej SON Holdings, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
WP HEALTH CONSULTING, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00950
Plaintiff: WP HEALTH CONSULTING, LLC
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
ATECHGOV, LLC v. USA
as 1:2024cv00954
Plaintiff: ATECHGOV, LLC
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
TECH SYSTEMS, INC. v. USA
as 1:2024cv00955
Plaintiff: TECH SYSTEMS, INC.
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
SANDS et al v. USA
as 1:2024cv00951
Plaintiff: SANDRA SANDS and STEVEN ASSAEL
Defendant: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Maayah v. FAREVA USA, INC. et al
as 1:2024cv04731
Plaintiff: Sofia Maayah
Defendant: FAREVA USA, INC., CHROMAVIS USA, INC., THIBAUT FRAISSE and others
Rountree v. USA
as 3:2024cv01081
Petitioner: Latrell Rountree
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Kamal v. USA
as 3:2024cv01085
Petitioner: David Kamal
Respondent: USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
KLC FINANCIAL, LLC v. SARC USA, INC et al
as 1:2024cv00123
Plaintiff: KLC FINANCIAL, LLC
Defendant: SARC USA, INC, SARC AZ - MESA LLC, SARC IL - ST. CHARLES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?