Cases filed in the D.C. Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 67
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. DEVOS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01468
Plaintiff: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA and others
Defendant: ELISABETH DEVOS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION and UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Amicus Curiae: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, AASA, SCHOOL SUPERINTENDENT'S ASSOCIATION and others
Petitioner: FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS IN EDUCATION, INDEPENDENT WOMEN'S LAW CENTER and SPEECH FIRST, INC.
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
State of California, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 20-1357
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency and Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner: State of New Jersey, State of Illinois, State of Colorado, by and through Attorney General Philip J. Weiser and the Colorado Department of Public Health and Environment and others
COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA et al v. DEVOS et al
as 1:2020cv01719
Plaintiff: DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, STATE OF COLORADO, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant: ELISABETH D. DEVOS and UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702
USA ex rel Elizabeth Kennedy, et al v. Novo A/S, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 20-7062
Plaintiff: United States of America, ex rel. Elizabeth W. Kennedy, et al.
Interested Party: State of Minnesota, State of Rhode Island, State of Delaware and others
Defendant / Appellee: Novo Nordisk A/S, Novo A/S, Novo Nordisk Foundation and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: Elizabeth W. Kennedy
Environmental Defense Fund, et al v. James Owens, et al
as 20-1169
Petitioner: Center for Biological Diversity, Conservation Law Foundation, Public Citizen, Inc. and others
Intervenor: State of Minnesota, City and County of Denver, State of Vermont and others
Respondent: James C. Owens, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator of the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Elaine L. Chao, in her official capacity as Secretary of the United States Department of Transportation and National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
State of California, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 20-1167
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, James C. Owens, in his official capacity as Acting Administrator, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and others
Petitioner: State of Colorado, City of Los Angeles, State of New Jersey and others
PENK v. GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv00378
Plaintiff: PAGE DAVID PENK
Defendant: DIRECTOR OF COLORADO DEPARTMENT OF LABOR/EMPLOYMENT and GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State of California, et al v. Andrew Wheeler, et al
as 19-1239
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency, Andrew Wheeler, in his official capacity as Administrator, United States Environmental Protection Agency, Elaine L. Chao, in her official capacity as Secretary, United States Department of Transportation and others
Petitioner: State of Colorado, City of Los Angeles, State of New Jersey and others
STATE OF CALIFORNIA et al v. CHAO et al
as 1:2019cv02826
Plaintiff: STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, STATE OF MINNESOTA, STATE OF MARYLAND and others
Defendant: ELAINE L. CHAO, NATIONAL HIGHWAY TRAFFIC SAFETY ADMINISTRATION, United States and others
Petitioner: NATIONAL COALITION FOR ADVANCED TRANSPORTATION, ASSOCIATION OF GLOBAL AUTOMAKERS, INC. and COALITION FOR SUSTAINABLE AUTOMOTIVE REGULATION
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0706
State of New York, et al v. EPA
as 19-1165
Respondent: Environmental Protection Agency
Petitioner: City of Boulder, (CO), City of South Miami, (FL), State of Colorado and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?