Immigration Cases filed in the U.S. Court of Appeals, Second Circuit matching "S"
Cases 131 - 140 of 829,235
Katrina Robertson v. US
as 24-1508
Plaintiff: KATRINA ROBERTSON
Defendant: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
A. Philip Randolph Institute v. North Carolina State Board of Elections
as 24-1512
Plaintiff: NORTH CAROLINA A. PHILIP RANDOLPH INSTITUTE and ACTION NC
Defendant: NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, DAMON CIRCOSTA, in his official capacity as CHAIR OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS, STELLA ANDERSON, in her official capacity as SECRETARY OF THE STATE BOARD OF ELECTIONS and others
Tina Tipsord v. Martin J. O'Malley
as 24-1972
Plaintiff: TINA S. TIPSORD
Defendant: MARTIN J. O'MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security
United States v. Anthony Brockman
as 24-2152
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: Anthony Omar Brockman
United States v. James Bowman
as 24-2156
Plaintiff: United States of America
Defendant: James E. Bowman, also known as Drake
P. et al v. United Healthcare Insurance Company et al
as 2:2024cv00406
Plaintiff: Sherri P. and M. P.
Defendant: United Healthcare Insurance Company, United Behavioral Health, Duke Energy Benefits Committee and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Navarro v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00009
Petitioner: Cesar M. Navarro
Respondent: United States of America
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00056
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv03347
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Biagini v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 3:2024cv03364
Plaintiff: MAY JOY S. BIAGINI
Defendant: The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Benefits

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?