Cases 1 - 10 of 23
Greater Chautauqua Federal Credit Union v. Quattrone
as 23-733
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Greater Chautauqua Federal Credit Union, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Boulevard Federal Credit Union, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated and Greater Niagara Federal Credit Union, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated
Appellant:
Western New York Law Center and Bartel Miller
Defendant:
Hon. Lawrence K. Marks, in his official capacity as Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts and Letitia James, in her official capacity as Attorney General of the State of New York
Defendant / Appellee:
Sheriff James B. Quattrone, Sheriff John Garcia, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Erie County, New York and Sheriff Michael J. Filicetti, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Niagara County, New York
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. et al v. Bruen et al
as 1:2022cv00907
Plaintiff:
New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc., Robert Nash, Brandon Koch and others
Defendant:
Kevin P. Bruen, Richard J. McNally, Jr., Rodney K. Harrison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
The People of the State of New York v. Arm or Ally, LLC et al
as 1:2022cv06124
Plaintiff:
The People of the State of New York, by Letitia James, Attorney General of the State of New York and The People of The State of New York
Defendant:
Arm or Ally, LLC, Blackhawk Manufacturing Group, Inc., A/K/A 80 Percent Arms, Inc. or 80 Percent Arms, Salvo Technologies, Inc., A/K/A 80P Builder or 80P Freedom Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 nr Notice of Removal
RHC Operating LLC v. City of New York
as 22-923
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RHC Operating LLC
Defendant / Appellee:
City of New York, Eric Adams, in his official capacity as Mayor of New York City, Adrienne E. Adams, New York City Council Member and others
Ruradan Corporation v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv03074
Plaintiff:
Ruradan Corporation
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, Jin Choi, Matthew Ahn and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
JLEE Corp.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Greater Chautauqua Federal Credit Union et al v. Marks et al
as 1:2022cv02753
Plaintiff:
Greater Chautauqua Federal Credit Union, Boulevard Federal Credit Union and Greater Niagara Federal Credit Union
Defendant:
Hon. Lawrence K. Marks, James B Quattrone, John C Garcia and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Western New York Law Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cvp Civil Rights (Personal Property)
Chrysafis v. Marks
as 22-3
Plaintiff:
Brandie LaCasse, Housing Court Answers, Make the Road New York and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Pantelis Chrysafis, Mudan Shi, Feng Zhou and others
Defendant / Appellee:
Lawrence K. Marks, in his official capacity as Chief Administrative Judge of the Courts of New York State
Defendant:
Adrian H. Anderson, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Dutchess County, New York, James Dzurenda, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Nassau County, New York, Joseph Fucito, in his official capacity as Sheriff of New York City, New York and others
Cooperative and Condominium Advisory Council (CCAC) et al v. Marks
as 7:2021cv10175
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Seven Pines Associates LP
Plaintiff:
Cooperative and Condominium Advisory Council, Apartment Owners Advisory Council, 35 Clinton Place LLC and others
Defendant:
Lawrence K. Marks
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc
RHC Operating LLC v. City Of New York et al
as 1:2021cv09322
Plaintiff:
RHC Operating LLC
Defendant:
City Of New York, Mayor Bill De Blasio, Adrienne E. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Chrysafis et al v. Marks et al
as 2:2021cv02516
Defendant:
Caroline Tang-Alejandro, Joseph Fucito, Lawrence K. Marks and others
Plaintiff:
Betty S. Cohen, Feng Zhou, Rent Stabilization Association of NYC, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
