Other Statutes Cases filed in the Second Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 60
CVS Pharmacy, Inc. et al v. Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals L.P., et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2019cv09999
Defendant: Handa Pharmaceuticals, LLC, Astrazeneca L.P., Astrazeneca UK Limited and others
Plaintiff: Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp.,, CVS Pharmacy, Inc. and Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
County of Rockland, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 7:2019cv05588
Plaintiff: County of Rockland, New York
Defendant: Cardinal Health Pharmacy Services, LLC, Purdue Pharma, Inc., CaremarkPCS Health, L.L.C. d/b/a CVS Caremark and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ra
In Re: Aggrenox Antitrust
as 19-754
Plaintiff: International Union of Painters and Allied Trades, District Council 21 Health and Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, HEB Grocery Company L.P., Minnesota and North Dakota Bricklayers and Allied Craftworkers Health Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Defendant / Appellee: Teva Women's Health, Inc., FKA Duramed Pharmaceuticals Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Barr Laboratories Inc., a Delaware Corporation and others
Plaintiff / Appellee: Pipefitters Union Local NO 537 Health & Welfare Fund, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated, AGC-International Union of Operating Engineers Local 701 Health & Welfare Trust Fund, Welfare Plan of the International Union of Operation Engineers Locals 137, 137A, 137B, 137C, 137R, on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated and others
Appellant: People of the State of California
Defendant: Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd., an Israeli Corporation
The County of Albany, New York v. Cardinal Health, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00273
Defendant: Kinray, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Rochester Drug Co-Operative, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: The County of Albany, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Rite Aid Corporation et al v. Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv11835
Defendant: Endo International PLC, Novartis Corporation, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp. and others
Plaintiff: Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., and Rite Aid Corporation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
City of Syracuse, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 5:2018cv01184
Defendant: Specgx, LLC, McKesson Corporation, Mallinckrodt, LLC and others
Plaintiff: City of Syracuse, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Village of Herkimer, New York v. Purdue Pharma, L.P. et al
as 6:2018cv00797
Defendant: McKesson Corporation, Purdue Pharma, Inc., INSYS Theraputics, Inc. and others
Plaintiff: Village of Herkimer, New York
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
In re Novartis and Par Antitrust Litigation We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2018cv04361
Defendant: Endo Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Par Pharmaceutical, Inc., Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation and others
Plaintiff: Drogueria Betances, LLC, H-E-B LP, Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp., and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: Law Enforcement Health Benefits Inc., Turlock Irrigation District and UFCW Local 1500 Welfare Fund
Respondent: Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Not Classified By Court: Lupin Ltd., Lupin Pharmaceuticals, Inc., OptumRX, Inc. and others
Interested Party: Caremark PHC, LLC and Mylan Pharmaceuticals Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Zani v. Rite Aid Corporation
as 17-1230
Plaintiff - Appellant: Robert Zani, individually and on behalf of all others similary situated
Defendant - Appellee: Rite Aid Hdqtrs. Corp.
Defendant: Rite Aid Corporation
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2017cv06044
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?