Cases 71 - 80 of 251
Reches v. Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
as 19-547
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Benjamin Reches
Defendant / Appellee:
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC
Alaska Electrical Pension Fund v. Bank of America, N.A. et al
as 1:2019cv01796
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Alaska Electrical Pension Fund, PUERTO RICO GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES AND JUDICIARY RETIREMENT SYSTEMS ADMINISTRATION and Police Retirement System of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 25
In re GSE Bonds Antitrust Litigation
as 1:2019cv01704
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Electrical Workers Pension System Local 103, I.B.E.W., City of Birmingham Retirement and Relief System, Local 103, I.B.E.W. Health Benefit Plan and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Deerfield Beach Municipal Firefighters Pension Trust Fund and Lincolnshire Police Pension Fund
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Oklahoma Police Pension and Retirement System
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Frazier v. Morgan Stanley & Co, LLC
as 19-462
Petitioner:
Aisha Rada, Jeanna Pryor, Yared Abraham and others
Respondent:
Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Morgan Stanley and Morgan Stanley Smith Barney LLC
The City of Philadelphia v. Bank of America Corporation et al
as 1:2019cv01608
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Wachovia Bank, N.A., Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and others
Plaintiff:
The City of Philadelphia, City of Philadelphia and San Diego Association of Governments
Consolidated Defendant:
Fifth Third Securities, Inc., BMO Financial Corp., BMO Financial Group and others
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Interested Party:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation (Monopolizing Trade)
Yu v. GreenSky, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00100
Defendant:
Fifth Third Securities, Inc., Morgan Stanley & Co. LLC, Guggenheim Securities, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley Yu
Petitioner:
Luciano Felice and The Police Retirement System of St. Louis
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
Kupfner v. Altice USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv06601
Defendant:
Citigroup Global Markets Inc., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Deutsche Bank Securities Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Joshua Kupfner, Franck Chauvin and Stephanie Garcia
Petitioner:
Andrea Hadzimichalis, Garfield Anderson and Jeffrey Greenside
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Allianz Global Investors GmbH et al v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv10364
Plaintiff:
SEI Trust Company, BlueCrest Capital Management Limited, Blackrock, Inc. and others
Defendant:
Goldman, Sachs & Co. LLC, Royal Bank of Scotland PLC, Barclays Capital, Inc. and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
BlackRock Utilities, Infrastructure & Power Opportunities Trust and iShares S&P/TSX 60 Index Fund
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Retail Wholesale Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund v. Synchrony Financial et al
as 3:2018cv01818
Plaintiff:
Retail Wholesale Department Store Union Local 338 Retirement Fund, Stichting Depositary APG Fixed Income Credits Pool and Stichting Depositary APG Developed Markets Equity Pool
Defendant:
Brian M Doubles, Synchrony Financial, Margaret M Keane and others
Consolidated Defendant:
Arthur W Coviello, Jr., Laurel J Richie, William W Graylin and others
Petitioner:
Danica Pension, Livsforsikringsaktieselskab, Heavy & General Laborers Local 472 & 172 Pension, Annuity and Welfare Funds and KBC Asset Management NV
Consolidated Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Gilbert and Maureen Aldridge
SL-X IP S.A.R.L. v. Bank Of America Corporation et al
as 1:2018cv10179
Defendant:
J.P. Morgan Strategic Securities Lending Corp., J.P. Morgan Securities LLC, Goldman Sachs Execution & Clearing, L.P. and others
Plaintiff:
SL-X S.A.R.L. and SL-X IP S.A.R.L.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
