Cases 1 - 10 of 81
Saunders v. Doe et al
as 3:2024cv00054
Plaintiff:
Tywonne Terriel Saunders
Defendant:
John Doe, Hurdle, Washington and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Dixon et al
as 9:2024cv00012
Plaintiff:
Courtney J. Saunders
Defendant:
Stacy Dixon, Melissa M. Davis and State of New York Department of Corrections and Community Supervision
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Edward et al
as 7:2023cv06370
Plaintiff:
Tori Saunders
Defendant:
H.O. Corley Edward and D. Venettozzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Van Bramer v. Saunders et al
as 9:2022cv00798
Plaintiff:
Robert Van Bramer
Defendant:
Cindy Saunders, K. Birdsall, Moskal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Sessum v. Saunders et al
as 9:2022cv00506
Plaintiff:
Daniel Sessum
Defendant:
Christopher Saunders, People of the State of New York, John/Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stephenson v. Davis et al
as 3:2022cv00644
Plaintiff:
Joseph Stephenson
Defendant:
Carlene Davis, Angel Quiros, Kristine Barone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Saunders v. Harrington
as 22-340
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Marcus Saunders
Defendant / Appellee:
Eric Gonzalez, Esq., William M. Harrington, Tamara Marshall and others
Saunders v. Harrington et al
as 1:2021cv06038
Plaintiff:
Marcus Saunders
Defendant:
William M. Harrington, Eric Gonzalez, Tamara Marshall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Campbell v. Cook et al
as 3:2021cv01253
Plaintiff:
Jessie Campbell, III
Defendant:
Rollins Cook, Angel Quiros, Guiliana Mudano and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saunders v. Busha et al
as 3:2021cv00472
Defendant:
John Doe and Busha
Plaintiff:
William Saunders
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
