Cases 121 - 130 of 778
Maldonado Lopez v. Garland
as 22-6039
Petitioner:
SANTOS JAVIER MALDONADO LOPEZ
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans with Disabilities Act
Evans v. Corrections et al
as 3:2022cv00074
Plaintiff:
Nolan Evans
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Kristine Barone, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Maldonado v. United States of America
as 21-2983
Petitioner / Appellant:
Edwin Maldonado
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America
United States of America v. Palermo
as 21-2868
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Miguel Guzman, Miguel Ramirez, AKA Mickey, Felix Cordero, Sr., AKA Pops and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Hector Palermo, AKA Hec
Maldonado v. United States of America
as 1:2021cv09357
Plaintiff:
Edwin Maldonado and Rohelio Edwin Maldonado
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Evans v. Corrections et al
as 3:2021cv01467
Plaintiff:
Nolan Evans
Defendant:
Department of Corrections, Kristine Barone, Maldonado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05855
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
United States of America v. Palermo (Maldonado)
as 21-2311
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Hector Palermo, AKA Hec, Miguel Guzman, Miguel Ramirez, AKA Mickey and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Elvin Maldonado
Caldwell v. Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv07842
Plaintiff:
Craig Caldwell
Defendant:
Santander Consumer USA Holdings Inc., Mahesh Aditya, Homaira Akbari and others
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Juan Carlos Alvarez de Soto
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
