Cases 161 - 170 of 486
Pena v. DOC
as 3:2016cv01813
Defendant:
DOC
Plaintiff:
Antonio Pena
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pena v. DOC
as 3:2016cv01809
Plaintiff:
Antonio Pena
Defendant:
DOC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Green v. Fischer
as 16-3676
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Shawn Green
Defendant - Appellee:
Schmelzle
Defendant:
Brian Fischer, Commissioner for Department of Correctional Services (DOCS), Lucien J. LeClaire, Jr., Deputy Commissioner, Karen Bellamy, Director, Inmate Grievance program (IGP) and others
Brogdon v. City Of New York, et al
as 1:2016cv08076
Defendant:
City of New York, Department of Corrections, Kings County District Attorney's Office and others
Plaintiff:
Conell Brogdon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2016cv07369
Plaintiff:
Steven Davis
Defendant:
The City Of New York, NYC DOC Administrative Jane Doe, NYC DOC Administrative John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Franco v. Thomas et al
as 1:2016cv06352
Plaintiff:
Manuel Franco
Defendant:
Thomas, Doc. K and Raymond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hillman v. NYC DOC et al
as 1:2016cv05784
Plaintiff:
Baron Hillman
Defendant:
NYC DOC, Joseph Ponte, Maxsolaine Mingo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Murphy v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv04415
Plaintiff:
Ernest Murphy
Defendant:
City of New York , Captain Pittman, #969 (first name unknown), NYC DOC Officer Sinacore, #15459 (f/n/u) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Christopher Daniels v. The City Of New York , et al
as 1:2016cv02992
Defendant:
The City Of New York, John/Jane Doe GMDC Warden, John/Jane Doe GMDC Deputy Warden and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Daniels
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Parrilla v. City of New York et al
as 1:2016cv02677
Plaintiff:
Scott Parrilla
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Department of Corrections, NYC DOC Transportation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
