Cases 11 - 20 of 37
Miller v. Martinez
as 1:2017cv05379
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Miller
Defendant:
Frank Martinez, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rivers v. Pogozelski et al.
as 1:2017cv02076
Plaintiff:
Charles Lee Rivers
Defendant:
J. Pogozelski and County of Orange
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
International Society for Kris v. Palmieri
as 16-4205
Plaintiff - Appellant:
International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc., Nikhil Gupta, AKA Nimai Pandit Das, Charles Lee, AKA Raja Vidya Das and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Daniel Palmieri, as Justice of New York Supreme Court, Nassau County, Edward A. Maron, as Justice of New York Supreme Court, Nassau County, R. Bruce Cozzens, as Justice and Presiding Judge, Trial Assignment Part of New York Supreme Court, Nassau County and others
International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. et al v. Palmieri et al
as 1:2016cv05924
Plaintiff:
Braj Kishor Aggarwal, Benjamin Berwing, Balarama Das and others
Defendant:
Hon. Bruce Cozzens, Edward Kelley, Hon. Roy S. Mahon and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
International Society for Krishna Consciousness, Inc. et al v. Palmieri et al
as 2:2016cv05924
Plaintiff:
Braj Kishor Aggarwal, Benjamin Berwing, Balarama Das and others
Defendant:
Hon. R. Bruce Cozzens, Edward Kelley, Hon. Daniel Roy Mahon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marino v. Koenigsmann et al
as 9:2012cv01170
Plaintiff:
Richard Marino
Defendant:
Carl J. Koenigsmann, Charles Lee, David Haimes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gulino v. Crossdale et al
as 3:2012cv00156
Plaintiff:
Jason P. Gulino
Defendant:
Beth Crossdale, Charles Lee, Anthony Coletti and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2010cv01877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
