Cases 11 - 20 of 185
Burrell v. Bishop et al
as 9:2022cv01156
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Reginald Bishop, Hill, Vesenske and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2022cv06475
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Johnson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennet v. Washington et al
as 3:2022cv01036
Plaintiff:
Julian Bennet
Defendant:
Washington, Thomas Kenny, Snyder and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roman v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv00911
Plaintiff:
Jason A. Roman
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Jesus Guaddrama, Kirsten Barone and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henderson v. Universal Security Instruments, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv04354
Plaintiff:
Thomas Henderson
Defendant:
Universal Security Instruments, Inc., Harvey B. Grossblatt, Cary Luskin and others
El Bey v. Dogdig et al
as 1:2022cv00091
Plaintiff:
Jakim El Bey
Defendant:
Victor G. Dogdig, Lucy Borzelino, Eva Lake and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Murphy v. Triple-S Management Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv10259
Plaintiff:
John Murphy
Defendant:
Triple-S Management Corporation, Roberto Garcia-Rodriguez, Luis A. Clavell-Rodriguez and others
Ryan v. Triple-S Management Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv09827
Plaintiff:
John Ryan
Defendant:
Triple-S Management Corporation, Stephen L. Ondra, Roberto Garcia-Rodriguez and others
Morgan v. Triple-S Management Corporation et al
as 1:2021cv09855
Plaintiff:
Anthony Morgan
Defendant:
Triple-S Management Corporation, Stephen L. Ondra, Roberto Garcia-Rodriguez and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
