Cases 11 - 20 of 327
Dudley v. Burgos et al
as 5:2024cv00222
Plaintiff:
Ellis Davon Dudley, II
Defendant:
Tamara Burgos and Department of Social Services
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Muzumala v. City of New York
as 24-806
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA MUZUMALA, -
Defendant:
CITY OF NEW YORK, BRONXWORKS, PROJECT RENEWAL and others
Genao v. Ruiz et al
as 1:2024cv02077
Plaintiff:
Gabino Genao
Defendant:
Elvis Ruiz, Jr., Kenneth Stukes, Robin Collins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wareka v. Le Kitsune LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02059
Plaintiff:
Tamara Wareka p/k/a Tamara Williams and Tamara Wareka
Defendant:
Le Kitsune LLC and Does 1 through 10 inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00887
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Chan et al v. United States Department of Transportation et al
as 1:2023cv10365
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Chan, Tamara Hoffman and Does 1 through 200
Defendant:
United States Department of Transportation, Federal Highway Administration, Shailen Bhatt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Tamara Wareka v. Glossier, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv10721
Plaintiff:
Tamara Wareka p/k/a Tamara Williams and Tamara Wareka
Defendant:
Glossier, Inc. and Does 1 through 10, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Wareka v. Sowa Corp. et al
as 1:2023cv08212
Plaintiff:
TAMARA WAREKA p/k/a TAMARA WILLIAMS, Tamara Wareka and Tamara Williams
Defendant:
SOWA CORP. d/b/a SOWA LASER SPA, DOES 1 through 10, inclusive and Sowa Corp. doing business as Sowa Laser Spa
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Fields v. Syrian Arab Rebublic
as 3:2023mc00109
Plaintiff:
Tamara Fields
Defendant:
Syrian Arab Rebublic
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
