Cases 11 - 20 of 20
Jones v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2016cv04657
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Mongielo v. The City of Lockport et al
as 1:2015cv00486
Plaintiff:
David J. Mongielo
Defendant:
The City of Lockport, William Jones, Heather Rohde and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Saracino v. Jones et al
as 3:2013cv01172
Plaintiff:
Debra Saracino
Defendant:
William Jones and Contract Transportation System Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00172
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jones et al v. Takeda Pharmaceuticals North America, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05368
Defendant:
Eli Lilly and Company, Takeda Global Research & Development Center Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited and others
Plaintiff:
Tammy Jones and William Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Jones v. Schneiderman et al
as 1:2011cv04383
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Defendant:
New York Supreme Court and Eric Schneiderman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fudge v. Onondaga County et al
as 5:2011cv00525
Plaintiff:
Anthony Fudge
Defendant:
Onondaga County, William Jones, Timothy Hines and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. The New York State Supreme Court et al
as 1:2010cv03198
Defendant:
Andrew Cuomo and The New York State Supreme Court
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
United States of America v. Jone
as 10-1920
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant - Appellant:
William Jones
Jones v. Atul et al
as 1:2007cv00033
Plaintiff:
William Jones
Defendant:
Josh I. Atul and Kulwant S. Kooner
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
