Cases 21 - 30 of 88
Casilla et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11645
Plaintiff:
Luis Delgado, Patricia Samuel, Zhen Jun Chen and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605
Abdul-Jalil et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11485
Plaintiff:
Vincent DeMarinis, William Bialkoski, Luciano Caceres and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
King et al v. Keyser et al
as 7:2018cv11301
Plaintiff:
Eric Tolliver and Mrs. Colleen King
Defendant:
B. Powell, J. Dewitt, Alicia Smith-Roberts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daly v. The Town of Dewitt et al
as 6:2018cv00845
Defendant:
Officer Peter Hooser, The Town of Dewitt, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Michele Daly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Tolliver v. Keyser et al
as 1:2018cv04391
Plaintiff:
Eric Tolliver
Defendant:
William Keyser, E. Burnett, J. Dewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DeWitt v. Berryhill
as 3:2017cv01895
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Plaintiff:
Kizzy DeWitt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405
McGriff v. Keyser et al
as 1:2017cv08619
Plaintiff:
Dewitt McGriff
Defendant:
Keyser, Bunch and Burnett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McGriff v. Superintendent Keyser et al
as 1:2017cv07307
Plaintiff:
Dewitt McGriff
Defendant:
Superintendent Keyser, Hearing Officer Polizzi and Director of SHU Vennetozzi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salgado v. Orange County Correctional Facility et al
as 1:2017cv06040
Plaintiff:
Lazaro Salgado
Defendant:
Orange County Correctional Facility, Carl E. DuBois, D.K. Dewitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dewitt Stern Group, Inc. v. Eisenberg
as 17-2274
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellant:
Dewitt Stern Group, Inc.
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellee:
Richard Eisenberg and Arthur J. Gallagher Risk Management Services, Inc.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
