Cases 21 - 30 of 39
Brown-Davis v. Cunningham
as 9:2016cv00163
Petitioner:
Anthony Brown-Davis
Respondent:
Robert F. Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brown-Davis v. Cunningham
as 1:2016cv00349
Petitioner:
Anthony Brown-Davis
Respondent:
Robert F. Cunningham
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Browne v. Pillai et al
as 3:2015cv00097
Plaintiff:
Anthony Browne
Defendant:
Omprakash Pillai, Syed Naqvi, Raquel Lightner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnett v. Advanced American Style, Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv10165
Plaintiff:
James Barnett
Defendant:
Advanced American Style, Inc., Michael Anthony Brown and Mark-Anthony Edwards
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 020
Brown v. Long Island Rail Road Company
as 2:2014cv06763
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brown
Defendant:
Long Island Rail Road Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51 Railways: Fed. Employer's Liability Act
Grossbard v. Cain et al
as 1:2014cv07627
Plaintiff:
Jodi Grossbard
Defendant:
Charles Cain , Anthony Brown , Marie Louis Meng and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. Smith
as 14-2801
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Anthony Brown, AKA Rassconi, Frank Doughty, AKA Fresh, Carnell Edwards, AKA Kerm and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Michael Smith, AKA Smitty, AKA Fingers
United States of America v. Smith (Lee)
as 14-1084
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Michael Smith, AKA Smitty, AKA Fingers, Anthony Brown, AKA Rassconi, Frank Doughty, AKA Fresh and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Robert Lee, AKA B.O.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01960
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Brown v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv00838
Defendant:
P.O. "Jane Doe" and "John Doe" 1-10 and The City of New York
Plaintiff:
Anthony Brown
SH. 1824:
Det. Lorne Kanover
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
