Cases 21 - 30 of 36
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2015cv05802
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Rodriguez v. Mingo et al
as 1:2015cv07945
Plaintiff:
Ralph Rodriguez
Defendant:
M. Mingo, Tony Durante, Gant and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fichter v. Gant Rugger, et al
as 1:2015cv05646
Plaintiff:
Ronald W Fichter
Defendant:
Gant Rugger and Gant U.S.A. Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Washington et al v. Ross et al
as 7:2014cv03091
Plaintiff:
Will Washington , Joseph A. Foy II , Sheehnaz Hirji and others
Defendant:
Ronald O. Ross , Lloyd Newland , Davis Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Graham (Hightower)
as 13-2821
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Larone Graham, AKA Abgod Graham, Jamel Thompson, AKA "Mel", AKA "Bad Boy", Quran Hollis and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Sean Hightower, AKA "Hop"
Appalseed Productions, Inc. et al v. Medianet Digital, Inc. et al
as 1:2011cv05922
Plaintiff:
Appalseed Productions, Inc. , Charles Lloyd , Darius Brooks and others
Defendant:
Medianet Digital, Inc., Alan McGlade and Stephen Barraclough
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Gant v. Walsh
as 10-2739
Petitioner - Appellant:
Stanley Gant
Respondent - Appellee:
James Walsh, Superintendent
Stancuna v. Ulianova et al
as 3:2009cv01328
Plaintiff:
Vernon Stancuna
Defendant:
Liubov Ulianova, Town of Wallingford, Wallingford Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stancuna v. Ulianova et al
as 3:2009mc00211
Plaintiff:
Vernon Stancuna
Defendant:
Liubov Ulianova, Town of Wallingford, Wallingford Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Stancuna v. Gant
as 3:2009cv00989
Plaintiff:
Vernon Stancuna
Defendant:
Tira Gant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
