Cases 21 - 30 of 38
Ashline v. Mami
as 13-3242
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Danny Ashline
Defendant - Appellee:
Harry Mamis, Supple, "John" and NYS Attorney General
Ashline v. Mamis et al
as 1:2012cv08117
Plaintiff:
Danny Ashline
Defendant:
Harry Mamis and Supple
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Byng v. Wright et al
as 12-1641
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Kevin V. Byng
Defendant - Appellee:
Harry Mamis, Fishkill Correctional Facility NYSDOCS - individually, Harry Mamis, Fishkill Correctional Facility NYSDOCS - in official capacity, New York State Department of Correctional Services (NYSDOCS) and others
Jordan v. SmithKline Beecham Corporation
as 1:2010cv00470
Plaintiff:
Mamie Jordan
Defendant:
SmithKline Beecham Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Sia-Pao v. Department of Correctional Services et al
as 1:2010cv00382
Plaintiff:
Leopold Sia-Pao
Defendant:
Department of Correctional Services, WIlliam J. Connoly, Elizabeth Williams, J. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Byng v. Wright et al
as 1:2009cv09924
Plaintiff:
Kevin V. Byng
Defendant:
Lester Wright, Lester Wright, NYS Department of Correctional Services (NYSDOCS) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burton v. Mamis et al
as 1:2009cv09363
Plaintiff:
Anthony David Burton
Defendant:
Mamis, A. Maume, Sottile and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2009cv01032
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Richard Salvatierra v. Connolly et al
as 1:2009cv03722
Plaintiff:
Richard Salvatierra
Defendant:
Superintendent Connolly, Correction Officer Montgomery, Sergeant Telesco and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Zink v. VanMiddlesworth et al
as 1:2009mc00026
Plaintiff:
Robert C. Zink
Defendant:
Frank F. VanMiddlesworth, Jr., William G. Vanmiddlesworth, Jr., William Vanmiddlesworth and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
