Cases 31 - 40 of 631
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv06951
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Palmer v. Aetna Medicaid Administrators LLC
as 3:2023cv01010
Plaintiff:
Crystal Palmer
Defendant:
Aetna Medicaid Administrators LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Burrell v. Howard et al
as 9:2023cv00915
Plaintiff:
Ako K. Burrell
Defendant:
Sgt. Howard, Sgt. Topel, Sgt. Brinkerloft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv06156
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Palmer v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2023cv00657
Plaintiff:
Parris Palmer
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tillman v. Louis
as 23-963
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Cherell Tillman, on behalf of B.K.T. and A.N.L.
Defendant / Appellee:
William Louis and Sheriff Williams
Defendant:
Ella Esha, Martha Pollack, Abdula Greene and others
Ocean Trails CLO VII et al v. MLN TopCo Ltd. et al
as 1:2023cv05443
Plaintiff:
Ocean Trails CLO VII, Boston Patriot Milk St LLC, 400 Capital Credit Opportunities Maser Fund Ltd. and others
Defendant:
MLN TopCo Ltd., Mitel Networks (International) Ltd., MLN US TopCo Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity Action
Alli v. Palmer et al
as 1:2023cv04699
Plaintiff:
Umar Alli
Defendant:
ESU Palmer, ESU Officers John Doe, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv04080
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Phillips et al v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv03446
Plaintiff:
Huw Phillips and Emma Palmer
Defendant:
Exactech, Inc. and Exactech U.S., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
