Cases 31 - 40 of 108
Goodrich v. US Post Office
as 6:2020cv00015
Defendant:
US Post Office
Plaintiff:
Craig S. Goodrich
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Richardson v. Robinson
as 19-4346
Defendant / Appellee:
Homeland Security Officer, Officer Robinson and Officer John Doe, Post Cadman Plaza Post Office
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Richard Richardson
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv07139
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Genao v. Post Office Manhattanville
as 1:2019cv00835
Defendant:
Post Office Manhattanville
Plaintiff:
Elvin Genao
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Post Office Square LLC et al v. Village of Spring Valley et al
as 7:2018cv09687
Defendant:
Village of Spring Valley Board of Trustees, Village of Spring Valley, Alan M. Simon Mayor of Spring Valley and others
Plaintiff:
Post Office Square LLC and Larry Weinstein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 cvp
Steiger v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv05323
Defendant:
Dominique Ann Polk, United States Post Office and United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Steiger
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Best v. The City of N.Y. et al
as 1:2018cv05973
Defendant:
Correction Officer #3, NYC Dept. of Corrections N.Y.S. Parole, NYC Health and Hospitals and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Best
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv05342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Poteat v. Post Office
as 3:2018cv00931
Plaintiff:
Kennara Poteat
Defendant:
Post Office
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
Cham v. United States of America
as 18-1347
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Emmanuella Cham
Defendant - Appellee:
United States of America, Disciples, Carlo Jean Francois, Barber, Climpton, Jean Doe and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
