Cases 31 - 40 of 78
Khan v. City of New York et al
as 1:2014cv04665
Defendant:
City of New York, John Doe and Jane Doe 1-5, Kashif Khan and others
Plaintiff:
Hafsa Khan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
650 Fifth Avenue Company v. Kurt Salmon US Inc. et al
as 1:2014cv05110
Petitioner:
650 Fifth Avenue Company
Respondent:
Kurt Salmon US Inc. and XYZ Corporation
Counter_claimant:
Kurt Salmon US Inc.
Counter_defendant:
650 Fifth Avenue Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Salmon v. Bellinger
as 9:2014cv00827
Plaintiff:
Nema Salmon
Defendant:
Officer Bellinger
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Salmon v. Cahill
as 3:2014cv00915
Plaintiff:
Marvin Salmon
Defendant:
Cahill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Salmon v. Blesser
as 14-1993
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Oliver Salmon
Defendant:
John Doe, 1 and 2, The name being fictitious but intended to represent one or more employees of the Albany Police Department
Defendant - Appellee:
Thomas Blesser, Individually and in his official capacity as an Albany, New York Police Officer, Albany Police Department and City of Albany, New York
West v. C.O. Salmon
as 1:2014cv04005
Plaintiff:
Adam West
Defendant:
C.O. Salmon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv02637
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 20 U.S.C. § 1400 Civil Rights of Handicapped Child
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00980
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
West v. Salmon et al
as 1:2013cv07265
Plaintiff:
Adam West
Defendant:
Salmon and Taylor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05351
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
