Cases 31 - 40 of 1,850
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
William Murphy, et al v. State of Delaware Justices of the Peace, et al
as 24-1710
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM MURPHY, individually and as guardian ad litem on behalf of A.T. and K.M. and TANISHA MURPHY
Defendant:
STATE OF DELAWARE JUSTICES OF THE PEACE, THE HONORABLE ALAN DAVIS, in his official capacity only as Chief Magistrate of the Justices of the Peace, CONSTABLE HUGH CRAIG, individually and in his official capacity as a Constable of the Justices of the Peace and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02996
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Equal Rights Under the Law
Monterde v. Garland
as 24-2450
Petitioner:
EUGENE FRANCIS MENGUITO MONTERDE
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Searcy v. Shrestha
as 24-10335
Plaintiff:
Candace Searcy
Defendant:
Bishnu Shrestha and Sanjay Rimal
Gonzalez v. Herrera, et al.
as 24-2371
Petitioner:
LEON ABEL GONZALEZ
Respondent:
JUAN HERRERA, Bureau of Prisons Residential Reentry Manager for Long Beach, in his official capacity and COLLETTE PETERS, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, in her official capacity
L. v. County of Trinity et al
as 3:2024cv02211
Plaintiff:
S. L.
Defendant:
County of Trinity, Tim Saxon, Ron Whitman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv02770
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Lozada-Moreno v. Garland
as 24-2256
Petitioner:
JOSE CIRILO LOZADA-MORENO
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
PATTERSON v. OCUGEN, INC. et al
as 2:2024cv01500
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN PATTERSON
Defendant:
OCUGEN, INC., SHANKAR MUSUNURI, SANJAY SUBRAMANIAN and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
