Cases 41 - 50 of 2,430
Lewis v. Affiliated Enterprise Solutions, LLC et al
as 8:2024cv00061
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillip Lewis
Defendant:
Affiliated Enterprise Solutions, LLC, AES Medical Supply, LLC and Brian Stevens
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 203 Equal Pay Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00029
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00121
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Liu v. Heastie et al
as 1:2024cv00812
Plaintiff:
Lewis Y. Liu
Defendant:
Carl Heastie, William A. Barclay, Andrea Stewart-Cousins and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 vc Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disabilities Act
Baker v. Amaral et al
as 1:2024cv00408
Plaintiff:
Lewis Baker
Defendant:
Walter Amaral, Doug Bewsher, Scott Genereux and others
Aigbekaen v. Gillepsie
as 24-428
Defendant:
WARDEN, WARDEN, FCI Danbury, GILLEPSIE, Lt., DURANT, Lt. and others
Plaintiff:
RAYMOND AIGBEKAEN
Lewis v. City of New York
as 1:2024cv00354
Plaintiff:
Joshua Lewis
Defendant:
NYPD Police Officers John Does 1-4, Jane Doe and The City of New York
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. Essex County, New York et al
as 8:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Scott Phillip Lewis
Defendant:
Essex County, New York, Town of North Elba, New York, Village of Lake Placid, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
