Cases 61 - 70 of 3,666
Daleb v. Town of Manchester et al
as 3:2024cv01113
Defendant:
Patrick Walsh, Andrew Young, Michael Heath and others
Plaintiff:
Abigail Daleb
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Andujar v. Purchase Street Ventures Corp et al
as 7:2024cv04862
Defendant:
Dina Grossman Nee Friendman, Adam Friedman and Purchase Street Ventures Corp doing business as Great Stuff Apparel Inc.
Plaintiff:
Magdalena Andujar
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cr Fed. Question: Civil Rights (Race Discrimination)
Palacios v. City of New York et al
as 1:2024cv04822
Defendant:
City of New York and John and Jane Doe 1 through 15
Plaintiff:
Adam Palacios
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Stoddard v. City of Hartford
as 24-1654
Plaintiff:
MISSY STODDARD
Defendant:
CITY OF HARTFORD, JARRETT HUNTER, ADAM DEMAINE and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04467
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1201 Civil Rights (Disability)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04403
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Adams v. Exactech, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv04313
Defendant:
Exactech US, Inc. and Exactech, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Berlinda Adams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Does et al v. New York City et al
as 1:2024cv04319
Defendant:
Lilmor Management LLC, David, Schiraldi and others
Plaintiff:
"John" Does and Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Kutas v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00570
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Adam Christopher Kutas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Abadi v. Adams
as 24-1608
Plaintiff:
AARON ABADI
Defendant:
ERIC ADAMS, in his personal capacity, THE CITY OF NEW YORK, BILL DE BLASIO, in his personal capacity and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
