Cases 61 - 70 of 113
Alford v. Epstein et al
as 1:2017cv05217
Plaintiff:
Herbert Alford
Defendant:
Eric J. Epstein, Kai A. Pittman, Montefiore Medical Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Pittman v. Gardner et al
as 9:2017cv00657
Plaintiff:
Abdus Sabury Fateen Akbary Pittman
Defendant:
Brian Gardner, Thomas Lanphear, Amy Vanalstyne and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Worley et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2017cv04337
Plaintiff:
Sandra Reid, Dorsey Futrell, Gale Richardson and others
Defendant:
City of New York and New York City Police Department
Receiver:
Quillermo Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Pittman v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. et al
as 1:2017cv04212
Plaintiff:
Bobbie Pittman
Defendant:
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co., Astrazeneca LP and Astrazeneca Pharmaceuticals LP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fuller v. Fuller et al
as 6:2017cv06306
Plaintiff:
Fitzalbert Fuller, Jr.
Defendant:
Fitzalbert Fuller, Sr., Vandel C. Fuller, Robert Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
In re: Farxiga (Dapagliflozin) Products Liability Litigation
as 1:2017md02776
Defendant:
Farxiga (Dapagliflozin) Products Liability Litigation, Astrazeneca AB, Bristol-Myers Squibb Co. and others
Plaintiff:
Denzil Martin, Racheal Blois, June Thompson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 pi
Fuller v. FUller et al
as 1:2017cv01841
Plaintiff:
Fitzalbert Fuller, Jr.
Defendant:
Fitzalbert FUller, Sr., Vandel C. Fuller, Robert Fuller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pittman v. Low et al
as 1:2016cv01464
Plaintiff:
Henry E. Pittman
Defendant:
Jeffrey J. Low, Joseph Stanzione, John Lyles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Deas v. Payreel, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv06346
Plaintiff:
Devrin Deas , Jobeth Bobee , Sefton Campbell and others
Defendant:
Payreel, Inc. and LDJ Productions NYC, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
