Cases 71 - 80 of 263
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01402
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv01400
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Lim Tung v. Deutsche Bank Trust Company et al
as 1:2019cv05445
Defendant:
Southpoint, Inc., Shawn A. Brenhouse, Intellectual Capital Management, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Hin Y. Lim Tung
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nationstar Mortgage LLC v. Scanlin et al
as 2:2019cv05324
Plaintiff:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC d/b/a Mr. Cooper, Nationstar Mortgage LLC and Nationstar Mortgage LLC doing business as Mr. Cooper
Defendant:
John Doe, Patricia Scanlin and Patricia A. Scanlin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04547
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1334
Borrani v. Nationstar Mortgage LLC
as 19-2204
Defendant / Appellee:
Nationstar Mortgage LLC, DBA Mr. Cooper, Shapiro, Dicaro & Barak, LLC
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Grace Borrani
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00880
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00747
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Johnson v. Locket et al
as 1:2019cv02873
Defendant:
The Secretary of Housing and Urban Development, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC and Nora Locket
Plaintiff:
Brenda Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Ocampo v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc. et al
as 3:2019cv00436
Defendant:
Bank of New York Mellon, Nationstar Mortgage, LLC, John Does and others
Plaintiff:
Juan Ocampo
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
