Cases 81 - 90 of 32,596
Santiago v. City of Rome et al
as 6:2024cv00704
Plaintiff:
Larry Santiago
Defendant:
City of Rome, City of Rome Police Department, Officer Joseph Longo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Sena v. Torres et al
as 3:2024cv00947
Plaintiff:
Alexis Sena
Defendant:
Torres, Villafane, Aloi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vazquez v. Martin et al
as 3:2024cv00941
Plaintiff:
Jose Vazquez
Defendant:
Martin, Moore, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ogle v. Doe et al
as 1:2024cv00516
Plaintiff:
John Ogle
Defendant:
Dr. John Doe, Surgeon John Doe and Daniel F. Matruscello, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Xebastian v. Osborn Correctional Institution et al
as 3:2024cv00951
Plaintiff:
Judas Xebastian
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional Institution, John Doe and Jane Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Best v. Moore et al
as 3:2024cv00923
Plaintiff:
Daris Best
Defendant:
Moore, Martin, A. Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alfonso v. Travis et al
as 6:2024cv06324
Plaintiff:
Ramon M. Alfonso
Defendant:
Michael Travis, Patrick McCann, Correction Officer Jeremy Comfort and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pynn v. Pynn et al
as 1:2024cv00508
Plaintiff:
Stacey Pynn
Defendant:
Matthew Pynn, New York State Unified Court System, New York State Office of Court Administration and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burrell v. Bell
as 24-1390
Plaintiff:
AKO K. BURRELL
Defendant:
EARL BELL, Superintendent CCF, WEBB, Education Supervisor of CCF, KING, Deputy Superintendent of Programs and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
