Cases 1 - 10 of 29
Gilberti v. United Nations
as 25-238
Petitioner:
JOSEPH D. GILBERTI, P.E.
Respondent:
UNITED NATIONS, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, Vice President KAMALA HARRIS and others
Sullivan v. Musk et al
as 3:2024cv01949
Defendant:
Donald Trump Jr., John Larson, Mark Bezos and others
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gilberti v. Yale University
as 24-3044
Defendant:
UNITED STATES CONGRESS, MARIA RUHL, Judge, JAMES DOMINGUEZ, Judge and others
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH D. GILBERTI, PE, a licensed Professional Engineer in the State of Florida
Sullivan v. Bezos et al
as 3:2024cv01836
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Defendant:
Mark Bezos, Jeffrey Bezos, Jerome Powell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Purisima v. Harris

as 1:2024cv08314
Defendant:
Kamala Harris, CRST, Inc., Commissioner of Social Security and others
Plaintiff:
Anton C. Purisima
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Gilberti v. Harvard University et al
as 3:2024cv01714
Defendant:
Rick Scott, Hunter Carroll, James Dominguez and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Gilberti
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gilberti v. Yale University et al
as 3:2024cv01708
Defendant:
Thomas Krug, Kimberly Carlton Bonner, Yale University and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Gilberti
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Brown v. Trump et al
as 1:2024cv07909
Plaintiff:
Sharon Leslie Brown
Defendant:
West Cornell, Donald Trump, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Sullivan v. Harris

as 3:2024cv01578
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Defendant:
Kamala Harris
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Sullivan v. Bezos et al
as 3:2024cv01390
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Kim Kardashian, David Rothschild and others
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.