Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Cheng v. United States of America
as 24-1131
Plaintiff:
SHENG-WEN CHENG, individually and on behalf of a class of all others similarly situated
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, C.O. ANDRE HICKSON, Warden JEAN RENE and others
Rolon et al v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2022cv01441
Plaintiff:
Rafael Rolon, Christopher Adamchek, Michael Aliffi and others
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv12086
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Leneau v. Ponte
as 18-683
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Ernest Leneau
Defendant - Appellee:
N.Y.C.D.O.C. Comm. Joseph Ponte, Deputy Warden Karen Collins, C.O. Simod Covington, #11730 and others
Defendant:
Deputy Warden Programs, "John Doe" and "Jane Doe" and C.O. Cumberland
Collins v. Berryhill
as 1:2017cv00467
Plaintiff:
Karen Collins
Defendant:
Nancy Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
Delgado v. Ponte et al
as 1:2017cv02444
Plaintiff:
Geovanee Delgado
Defendant:
Joseph Ponte , Karen Collins , Jenna Seabrook and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
White v. New York City Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2016cv06183
Plaintiff:
Erik White
Defendant:
New York City Dept. of Corrections, Joseph Ponte, Clement Glenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grant v. Collins
as 1:2015cv04699
Petitioner:
Sanders Grant
Respondent:
Karen Collins
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Watson v. Vance
as 1:2015cv04706
Plaintiff:
Joseph Watson
Defendant:
Cyrus R. Vance, Jr., Anthony J. Annucci, Thomas J. Herzog and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Smith v. Collins et al
as 1:2015cv00216
Plaintiff:
Osmondo D. Smith
Defendant:
Karen Collins, The City of New York, Department of Correction and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
