Cases 1 - 10 of 33
Lettieri v. Matson et al
as 3:2024cv00434
Plaintiff:
David C. Lettieri
Defendant:
Karen Matson, The Broome County Humane Society, David Gaska and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lettieri v. Matson
as 23-679
Petitioner / Appellant:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent / Appellee:
Karen Matson
Baldomero et al v. 3M Company et al
as 1:2023cv03344
Plaintiff:
Villareal Baldomero, James Wagenbrenner, Gary Palmerson and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 nr Notice of Removal
Lettieri v. Matson
as 9:2023cv00043
Petitioner:
David C. Lettieri
Respondent:
Karen Matson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv09435
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Clark v. Phillips et al
as 6:2020cv06926
Defendant:
C.O. Scott Phillips, Sgt. W. Adam, Jr., C.O. S. Wood and others
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torrez v. Meriden Police Department et al
as 3:2019cv01658
Defendant:
D. Matson, Meriden Police Department, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jose Anthony Torrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Agron et al v. Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
as 1:2018cv11841
Plaintiff:
Thomas Gonzalez, Peter Volpe, James Padula and others
Defendant:
Kingdom of Saudi Arabia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1605 A
Matson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2018cv04322
Plaintiff:
Sherri Matson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Matson et al v. MERSCORP Holdings Inc. et al
as 2:2017cv04224
Defendant:
MERSCORP Holdings Inc. and Plaza Home Mortgage, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Christina Matson and Lydia Matson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
