Cases 1 - 7 of 7
Hall v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00463
Plaintiff:
Michael John Hall
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 0405 dc Review of SSA Decision SSDC - Concurrent Title II and Title XVI Claims
Kinard v. Town of Greenwich Connecticut
as 22-3156
Plaintiff / Appellee:
Tramaine Kinard
Defendant:
Town of Greenwich Connecticut, Greenwich Police Department, Officer Ryan Beattie, Badge 141 and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Officer Michael M. Hall, Badge 147 and Sergeant James D. Smith
Hall v. Kijakazi
as 1:2021cv05049
Plaintiff:
Michael George Hall
Defendant:
Kilolo Kijakazi, Acting Commissioner of Social Security and Kilolo Kijakazi
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Kinard v. Town of Greenwich Connecticut et al
as 1:2021cv00474
Defendant:
UNKNOWN OFFICERS, DETECTIVES, SERGEANTS, LIEUTENANTS, CAPTAINS of the GREENWICH POLICE DEPARTMENT, TOWN OF GREENWICH, CONNECTICUT, CHIEF OF POLICE JIM HEAVEY and others
Plaintiff:
TRAMAINE T. KINARD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Hall v. Dept. of Corrections et al
as 1:2020cv05695
Defendant:
Marella Love, Dept. of Corrections and Patsy Yang
Plaintiff:
Michael A. Hall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fabricius v. Winchester et al
as 3:2014cv00049
Plaintiff:
Jacob Schack Fabricius
Defendant:
Joshua M. Winchester , Michael T. Hall , Dorian L. Stewart and others
Cross_claimant:
Joshua M. Winchester , Dorian L. Stewart , Cynthia B. Hall and others
Cross_defendant:
Cynthia B. Hall , Michael T. Hall , Dorian L. Stewart and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fidelity Security Life Insurance Company, Inc. et al v. Seldon Technologies, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00171
Plaintiff:
Fidelity Security Life Insurance Company, Inc. and Michael E. Hall
Defendant:
Seldon Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
