Cases 1 - 10 of 176
Sullivan v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv01003
Plaintiff:
Anna Sullivan
Defendant:
Anne Lamont, Kamala Harris, Ned Lamont and others
Lawson v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00917
Plaintiff:
Jeremy M. Lawson
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, William Tong, Matt Pitter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Roundtree v. Lamont
as 24-1319
Plaintiff:
Queen Princess ANJAKNIE ROUNDTREE, -Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglass, ELIZABETH QUEEN, ANDREW, King and others
Defendant:
NED LAMONT, State of Connecticut's Governor, JEN ZAROZI, State Capitol Police, DEVIN, Officer and others
Johnson v. State of Connecticut et al
as 3:2024cv00728
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
State of Connecticut, Cheyanne Clark, Mark Shepherd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cunningham v. Lupis
as 24-844
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. CUNNINGHAM, SR.
Defendant:
FRANCESCO LUPIS, Dr., COLLEEN GALLAGHER, RUDY ALVAREZ and others
Roundtree-Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglas et al v. Lamont et al
as 3:2024cv00540
Plaintiff:
Queen Princess Anjaknie Roundtree-Cohen-McCrorey-Palmer-Mirzz-Walker-Douglas, Elizabeth Queen, Andrew and others
Defendant:
Ned Lamont, Jen Zarozi, Devin and others
SHOES et al v. Biden et al
as 3:2024cv00364
Plaintiff:
SHOES and M. Alicea X.
Defendant:
Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Garner Correctional Institute and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Hasan v. Quiros et al
as 3:2024cv00197
Plaintiff:
Amin Hasan
Defendant:
Angel Quiros and Ned McCormick
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Harris v. Ganim et al
as 3:2024cv00078
Petitioner:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Respondent:
Joe Ganim, Michael C. Jankovsky, Roderick Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Jones v. McCormack
as 24-54
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAFAEL ARDEN JONES
Respondent / Appellee:
NED MCCORMACK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
