Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Maldonado v. Osborn Correctional
as 3:2024cv00696
Plaintiff:
Nester Maldonado
Defendant:
Osborn Correctional
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Richards et al v. City of New York
as 1:2023cv10220
Plaintiff:
Sherma Richards, Willis Wynne, Charles Agnello and others
Defendant:
City of New York
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Hamilton v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2023cv01070
Plaintiff:
Demezz Hamilton
Defendant:
The City of New York, New York City Children's Services, SCO Family of Services and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
In re: Philip A. Bralich
as 21-904
Respondent:
Michael Bralich, Charles Payne, Ronna McDaniel, Chairwoman, Republican National Committee and others
Petitioner:
Philip A. Bralich, Ph.D
Bralich v. Fox News Network, LLC.
as 21-884
Defendant / Appellee:
Newt Gingrich, Geraldo Rivera, Paul McKintrick and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Philip A. Bralich, Ph.D and Philip Andrew Bralich, Ph.D
Defendant:
Democratic National Party, Republican National Party and Greg Gutfeld
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00438
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Nester v. Woolridge et al
as 1:2017cv01655
Plaintiff:
Neville Nester
Defendant:
US Foods, Inc. and Nathaniel Woolridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Boroditskiy et al v. European Specialties, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00689
Petitioner:
Sergey Boroditskiy, Anatoly Koval and Aleksander Nester
Respondent:
European Specialties, LLC and Bieber, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Santana
as 3:2017mc00007
Plaintiff:
USA
Defendant:
Nester Santana
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Alexander v. Shanahan et al
as 1:2016cv05629
Plaintiff:
Nester Alexander
Defendant:
Christopher Shanahan, Loretta Lynch, Dianne McConnell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
