Cases 1 - 10 of 28
The Estate of Frank Pepine v. Huntington Hills Center for Health & Rehabilitation et al
as 2:2023cv01478
Plaintiff:
Roseann Mariani and The Estate of Frank Pepine
Defendant:
Huntington Hills Center for Health & Rehabilitation, ABC Corporation and ABC Partnership
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Pepin-Sanchez v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2022cv05583
Plaintiff:
Ms Johanna Pepin-Sanchez
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2020cv07130
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reyes Pepin v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2020cv08338
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Josefina Y. Reyes Pepin
Interested Party:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Leniart v. Ruiz et al
as 3:2020cv00392
Defendant:
Jane Ventrella, Cossette, Fisher and others
Plaintiff:
George M. Leniart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pepin v. Snap RTO, LLC et al
as 3:2018cv01667
Defendant:
SNAP RTO, LLC, Khater International, LLC, Ahmed Mohammed and others
Plaintiff:
Dean Pepin
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1640
Pepin et al v. Amica Mutual Ins. Co
as 3:2017cv01198
Defendant:
Amica Mutual Ins. Co
Plaintiff:
David R. Pepin and Kathleen E. Pepin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pepin v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv01216
Plaintiff:
Adalissa Pepin
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Pepin v. New York City Department Of Education,
as 1:2014cv09657
Plaintiff:
Milciades Pepin
Defendant:
New York City Department Of Education,
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States of America v. Quinone
as 13-3377
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Jose Lopez, AKA Pepe, Jose Rafael Lopez, AKA Pepin, Charlie Lopez and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Antonio Quinones
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
