Cases 1 - 10 of 7,425
Smith v. Oneida County Jail et al
as 9:2024cv00749
Plaintiff:
Wayne R. Smith
Defendant:
Oneida County Jail, Robert Maciol, Patternoster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Abujudeh v. Smith et al
as 1:2024cv04318
Plaintiff:
Charlie Zaki Abujudeh
Defendant:
Patrick J. Smith and Smith Villazor LLP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 lm Diversity - Legal Malpractice
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv04314
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 ag Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination (Age)
Burgison v. Smith et al
as 3:2024cv01001
Plaintiff:
Raymond Burgison
Defendant:
Deron Smith, Blevons, Quaid Cohleymore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04042
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Ryan et al v. Town of Amherst et al
as 1:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Daniel J. Ryan, Tara M. Kreuder and Mya Ryan
Defendant:
Town of Amherst, Gregory Pigeon, Heather Kystoiak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Lyle et al
as 1:2024cv02767
Plaintiff:
Emily Smith
Defendant:
james lyle and Fulmar Advisors LTD
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Harris v. Treadwell et al
as 3:2024cv00968
Plaintiff:
Gerard Vondrake Harris
Defendant:
Marc T. Treadwell, Charles H. Weigle, Sonja Profit and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Joleen Renee Smith
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Oparaji v. Home Retention Corp.
as 24-1444
Plaintiff:
MAURICE OPARAJI
Defendant:
HOME RETENTION CORP., BORCHERT AND LASPINA, PC, ROBERT W. FROMMER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
