Cases 1 - 10 of 71
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03949
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Johnson v. Gagne et al
as 3:2023cv01072
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Gerard G. Gagne, Daniel Yesu, Michelle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv01311
Plaintiff:
Gregory Johnson
Defendant:
Angel Quiros, Nick Rodriguez, Santiago and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2022cv04089
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Colds v. Westchester County et al
as 7:2022cv02023
Plaintiff:
JALEN COLDS
Defendant:
WESTCHESTER COUNTY, OFFICER JONES, OFFICER SMYTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Tuzman et al
as 1:2015cv07057
Intervenor:
Preet Bharara
Not Classified By Court:
Alvarez & Marsal Holdings LLC and Jones Day
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Kaleil Isaza Tuzman and Robin Smyth
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Cerilli v. Bysiewicz et al
as 3:2021cv01738
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Cerilli
Defendant:
Susan Bysiewicz, Ned Lamont, Angel Quiros and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Tuzman (Irfan Amanat)
as 21-2379
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kaleil Isaza Tuzman, Robin Smyth, Stephen E. Maiden and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Irfan Amanat
United States of America v. Tuzman (Omar Amanat)
as 21-2229
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kaleil Isaza Tuzman, Robin Smyth, Stephen E. Maiden and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Omar Amanat and Irfan Amanat
Cerilli v. Lamont et al
as 3:2021cv00525
Defendant:
Jesus Guadarrama, Jane Doe, Nick Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Raymond J. Cerilli
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
