Cases 1 - 10 of 41
Securities and Exchange Commission v. Stiles et al
as 1:2023cv01523
Defendant:
James Andrew Stiles, Jr., Edward Gray Stiles, Jr., Andrew Stiles and others
Plaintiff:
Securities and Exchange Commission
Fitzgerald v. The We Company et al
as 1:2020cv05260
Defendant:
David Stiles, The We Company doing business as WeWork and Danny Duong
Plaintiff:
Alexandria Fitzgerald
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2612
Stile v. United States of America
as 9:2020cv00368
Respondent:
United States of America and The Northern District of New York Probation
Petitioner:
James Stile
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Edmondson et al v. Raniere et al
as 1:2020cv00485
Defendant:
Lauren Salzman, Dr. Danielle Roberts, Kathy Russell and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe, Toni Natalie, Jane Doe and others
Interested Party:
Chakravorty Suneel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Hernandez Alejandro v. Steven Stile Farmers Mkt No 2 LLC et al
as 1:2019cv09504
Plaintiff:
Victorino Hernandez Alejandro
Defendant:
Steven Stile and Steven Stile Farmers Mkt No 2 LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 021
Stile v. Berryhill
as 19-1355
Plaintiff / Appellant:
James Stile
Defendant / Appellee:
Nancy A. Berryhill, Acting Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Power Up Lending Group, LTD. v. Grey Cloak Tech, Inc. et al
as 2:2018cv02832
Defendant:
William Bossung, Patrick Stiles and Grey Cloak Tech, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Power Up Lending Group, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Stile v. Berryhill
as 1:2018cv01824
Plaintiff:
James Stile
Defendant:
Nancy A. Berryhill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv07585
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2017cv06466
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
