Cases 11 - 20 of 52,097
John Marchisotto v. Juan Sanchez, et al
as 24-1922
Plaintiff:
JOHN F. MARCHISOTTO
Defendant:
JUDGE JUAN R. SANCHEZ, KENT A. JORDAN, MICHAEL A. CHAGARES and others
John Koehler v. Secretary Pennsylvania Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-9000
Plaintiff:
JOHN JOSEPH KOEHLER
Defendant:
SECRETARY PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, SUPERINTENDENT GREENE SCI and SUPERINTENDENT ROCKVIEW SCI
Ashley Georges v. Helen Godby, et al
as 24-1884
Plaintiff:
ASHLEY GEORGES
Defendant:
HELEN C. GODBY and YVONNE SMITH SEGARS
Rashonna Ransom v. GreatPlains Finance LLC, et al
as 24-1908
Plaintiff:
RASHONNA M. RANSOM, on behalf of herself and others similarly situated
Defendant:
GREATPLAINS FINANCE LLC, DBA Cash Advance Now
Cephea Valve Technologies Inc Equityholders' Repre v. Abbott Laboratories, et al
as 24-1912
Plaintiff:
CEPHEA VALVE TECHNOLOGIES INC EQUITYHOLDERS' REPRESENTATIVE, on behalf of the Cephea Valve Technologies, Inc. Participating Securityholders
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES and ABBOTT VASCULAR INC
Juan Argueta-Portillo v. Attorney General United States of America
as 24-1886
Petitioner:
JUAN ALEXANDER ARGUETA-PORTILLO
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Christopher Hall v. Mark Wahl, et al
as 24-1525
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER R. HALL
Defendant:
SUPERINTENDENT MARK WAHL, UNIT MANAGER MICHAEL SKUTACK, UNIT MANAGER JOE D'EANGLES and others
B&G Charter Management Limited v. S/V Zazie, et al
as 24-1888
Plaintiff:
B&G CHARTER MANAGEMENT LTD
Defendant:
S/V ZAZIE, U.S.C.G. No. 1324379, GRADY HOWELL TUMLIN, JR. and DEBRA JEAN ROBINSON
Mark Woods v. Shawn Wills, et al
as 24-1928
Plaintiff:
MARK WOODS
Defendant:
POLICE OFFICER SHAWN WILLS, #3680 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O THOMAS STRAIN, #4005 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, P/O LT. HOYT, #225 INDIVIDUALLY AND AS P/O FOR THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
