Cases 1 - 10 of 10
HUFF et al v. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY
as 3:2024cv00093
Defendant:
STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY and STATE FARM
Plaintiff:
JAMES R. HUFF, II and BARBARA F. HUFF
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition For Removal--Other Contract
HUFF v. ONEAMERICA
as 2:2023cv00267
Plaintiff:
BRIANA HUFF
Defendant:
ONEAMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.
HOUGE v. KIDD et al
as 3:2022cv00218
Plaintiff:
THOMAS HOUGE
Defendant:
TROOPER JASON KIDD, TROOPER BRADLEY HUFF, TROOPER TYLER BROUGH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Huff v. SoClean, Inc.
as 2:2022cv00913
Plaintiff:
John Huff
Defendant:
SoClean Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
TROVY et al v. BAYER U.S. LLC et al
as 2:2018cv01438
Plaintiff:
NORMA RHYMES, AMANDA LAWSON, MARLENE RUIZ and others
Defendant:
BAYER AG, BAYER U.S. LLC, BAYER HEALTHCARE LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HUFF v. CLARK et al
as 3:2018cv00065
Petitioner:
HAROLD BO HUFF
Respondent:
MICHAEL CLARK and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
ALLEN v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 3:2017cv00041
Plaintiff:
JACK E. ALLEN
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ERIC HOLDER, LORETTA LYNCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
WRIGHT et al v. SOMMER et al
as 3:2011cv00267
Plaintiff:
SHAUN WRIGHT and K. X. W.
Defendant:
JACOB N. SOMMER, THE LAW OFFICES OF JACOB N. SOMMER, CHURCHILL COUNTY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00632
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
