Cases filed in the US District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
MARTINEZ v. NAKLES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00823
Plaintiff: JUSTIN MARTINEZ
Defendant: NED NAKLES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
ASBURY et al v. EQT CORPORATION et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018cv01005
Plaintiff: RONALD AND TRACY LOVRICH, DONALD AND JULIA NEWTON, JOSEPH AND AMY HEBDA and others
Defendant: EQT PRODUCTION COMPANY, EQT MIDSTREAM PARTNERS, L.P., EQT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 (a) Fed. Question: Real Property
NED v. DOE et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2016cv00251
Plaintiff: JEREMY NED
Defendant: JOHN DOE, J. KARDIN, S. ECKENRODE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NED V. WARDEN FCI LORETTO, et al
as 3:2016cv00231
Plaintiff: JEREMY NED
Defendant: FCI LORETTO WARDEN, J. MILLER, S. ECKENRODE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
HUBER et al v. SMITH et al
as 2:2016cv00265
Plaintiff: RAYMOND A. HUBER and ANTHONY M. HELFER
Defendant: CATHERINE SMITH, NED J. NAKLES, NED J. NAKLES, ESQUIRE and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01125
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
STONER et al v. JODON et al
as 3:2007cv00053
Plaintiff: PETER D. STONER and RODERICK D. GAY
Defendant: RUTH JODON, NED J. NAKLES, JR. ESQ. L.L.C. and JAMES A. FOX, ESQ. L.L.C.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Civil Rights: Other
VIKING INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN v. SPELLS et al
as 2:2007cv00217
Plaintiff: VIKING INSURANCE COMPANY OF WISCONSIN
Defendant: NED L. SPELLS, JR., TIMOTHY E. JOHNSON, ENTERPRISE RENT-A-CAR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment (Insurance)
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?