Antitrust Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 1 - 10 of 50
Kouyate et al v. Apple, Inc.
as 2:2024cv07197
Not Yet Classified: APPLE INC. SMARTPHONE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff: MOUSSA KOUYATE, David Freifeld, Jarell Brown and others
Defendant: APPLE INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
DAVID A. BIRDSELL v. THE EUCLID CHEMICAL COMPANY et al
as 2:2024cv01726
Plaintiff: DAVID A. BIRDSELL
Defendant: THE EUCLID CHEMICAL COMPANY, RPM INTERNATIONAL INC, COMPAGNIE DE SAINT-GOBAIN S.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
BURLINGTON DRUG CO., INC. et al v. PFIZER INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2012cv02389
Plaintiff: A.F.L.-A.G.C. Building Trades Welfare Plan, ALLIED SERVICES DIVISION WELFARE FUND, AMERICAN SALES COMPANY INC. and others
Defendant: CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS SERVICE, CVS Caremark Corporation, DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. and others
Petitioner: MATRIX LABORATORIES LIMITED, MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. and MATRIX LABORATORIES INC.
Special Master: JOSE L. LINARES
In Re: LIPITOR ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Not Classified By Court: FAITH HOCHBERG
Intervenor: MYLAN INC.
Interested Party: CARDINAL HEALTH, INC.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
Coral Aviation Group et al v. Muller, Jr. et al
as 5:2023cv01838
Plaintiff: Coral Aviation Group and James Dastra
Defendant: Andrew M. Muller, Jr., Christina Muller-Levan, Reading Jet Center, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1 Antitrust Litigation
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF BRICKLAYERS AND ALLIED CRAFT WORKERS LOCAL 1 HEALTH FUND v. CELGENE CORPORATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2014cv06997
Defendant: PHV STANLEY E. FISHER and CELGENE CORPORATION
Plaintiff: International Union of Operating Engineers Stationary Engineers Local 39 Health and Welfare Trust Fund, THE DETECTIVES' ENDOWMENT ASSOCIATION, INC., David Mitchell and others
Consolidated Plaintiff: NEW ENGLAND CARPENTERS HEALTH BENEFITS FUND and CITY OF PROVIDENCE
In Re: Thalomid and Revlimid Antitrust Litigation
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC. et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO U.S., INC. et al
as 2:2020cv06290
Defendant: BAUSCH HEALTH AMERICAS, INC., HERITAGE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., PLIVA, INC. and others
Plaintiff: WINN-DIXIE STORES, INC. and BI-LO HOLDING, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
IN RE: RAILWAY INDUSTRY EMPLOYEE NO-POACH ANTITRUST LITIGATION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2018mc00798
Defendant: KNORR BRAKE COMPANY, FAIVELEY TRANSPORT NORTH AMERICA INC., WESTINGHOUSE AIR BRAKE CO. and others
Plaintiff: ASHLEY KERR, TIMOTHY BACCO, BRIAN LARA and others
In Re: IN RE: RAILWAY INDUSTRY EMPLOYEE NO-POACH ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Special Master: DAVID B. WHITE
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
IN RE: GENERIC PHARMACEUTICALS PRICING ANTITRUST LITIGATION
as 2:2016md02724
Defendant: GENERIC DIGOXIN AND DOXYCYCLINE ANTITRUST LITIGATION, MUTUAL PHARMACEUTICALS CO., INC., MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC. and others
In Re: DIRECT PURCHASER PLAINTIFFS PSC, INDIRECT RESELLERS PSC, IN RE: GENERIC DIGOXIN AND DOXYCYCLINE ANTITRUST LITIGATION and others
Intervenor: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Special Master: DAVID H. MARION, LINDA D. PERKINS, BRUCE P. MERENSTEIN and others
Respondent: SUSAN KNOBLAUCH and KAREN STRELAU
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Connecticut et al v. Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02407
Plaintiff: State of North Dakota, State of North Carolina, State of Minnesota and others
Defendant: ACTAVIS PHARMA, INC., Richard Rogerson, WOCKHARDT USA LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
RELIABLE PHARMACY et al v. ACTAVIS HOLDCO US, INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv06044
Defendant: BAUSCH HEALTH AMERICAS, INC., PLIVA, INC., GREENSTONE LLC and others
Plaintiff: CHET JOHNSON DRUG, FALCONER PHARMACY, RUSSELL'S MR. DISCOUNT DRUGS and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?