Cases 1 - 9 of 9
Gabriel Pittman v. USA, et al
as 23-2766
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GABRIEL ISHAM PITTMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA and C.O. II REIHART
Pittman v. United States of America et al
as 1:2023cv01385
Plaintiff:
Gabriel I. Pittman
Defendant:
United States of America, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and C.O. II Reihart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PITTMAN v. PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP et al
as 3:2017cv00163
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL PITTMAN
Defendant:
PRESIDENT DONALD J. TRUMP, UNITED STATES CONGRESS, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL, JEFF SESSIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PITTMAN v. SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL et al
as 3:2015cv03371
Plaintiff:
ELIJAH MATHEWS PITTMAN
Defendant:
SAINT FRANCIS HOSPITAL, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RUTGERS UNIVERSITY BEHAVIORAL HEALTH CARE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PITTMAN v. GLUNT
as 3:2011cv00148
Plaintiff:
TERRACE A. PITTMAN
Defendant:
STEVEN GLUNT, DEBBIE YOUNKIN, JANET PEARSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MCKINNEY v. GIORLA et al
as 2:2011cv04188
Plaintiff:
TRACEY MCKINNEY
Defendant:
LOUIS GIORLA, WILLIAM E. LAWTON, SAGREIYA SIDDHARTH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
William Pittman v. Metuchen Police Department, et al
as 10-4246
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
METUCHEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOROUGH OF METUCHEN, VINCENT RUSSO and others
William Pittman v. Metuchen Police Department, et al
as 09-4253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Defendant - Appellee:
METUCHEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOROUGH OF METUCHEN, ROBIN RENTENBERG and others
PITTMAN v. METUCHEN POLICE DEPARTMENT et al
as 2:2008cv02373
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM PITTMAN
Defendant:
METUCHEN POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOROUGH OF METUCHEN, ROBIN RENTENBERG and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
