Cases 1 - 10 of 20
ROSARIO v. BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY et al
as 2:2024cv01774
Plaintiff:
MARCUS A. ROSARIO
Defendant:
BUCKS COUNTY CORRECTIONAL FACILITY and INMATE SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSARIO v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv00966
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROSARIO
Defendant:
FORMER SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, SECRETARY, DR. LAUREL HARRY, DEPUTY SECRETARY TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSARIO v. HOLLOWOOD et al
as 2:2023cv00127
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROSARIO
Defendant:
LIEUTENANT HOLLOWOOD, C.O.1. PHILLIPS, C.O.1. RIGGLEMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Rosario v. Edward Strawn, et al
as 22-1312
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEITH ROSARIO
Defendant / Appellee:
EDWARD STRAWN, Warden, DEVYN BREESE, Counselor, CAPTAIN RESTANIO and others
Rosario v. Rivello et al
as 3:2021cv01840
Plaintiff:
Jose Rosario
Defendant:
J. Rivello, K. Kauffman, J. Spyker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. WESTMORELAND COUNTY, PA et al
as 2:2021cv00208
Defendant:
WESTMORELAND COUNTY COMMISSIONER, DEPUTY WARDEN LOWTHER, DEPUTY WARDEN SCHWARTZ and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROSARIO v. STRAWN et al
as 2:2019cv01040
Defendant:
CAPTAIN RESTANIO, EDWARD STRAWN, JOHN DOE and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH ROSARIO
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
ROSARIO v. CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECITONAL FACILITY
as 1:2016cv07802
Plaintiff:
ARMANDO ROSARIO
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY CORRECITONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NEGRON v. ROSARIO et al
as 5:2016cv04642
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL W. NEGRON
Defendant:
ROSARIO and AXELBAND
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ROSARIO v. THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM et al
as 2:2014cv05173
Plaintiff:
JOHN ROSARIO
Defendant:
THE PHILADELPHIA PRISON SYSTEM, JOHN DELANEY, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
