Cases 11 - 20 of 34
MILLER v. BRADY et al
as 3:2020cv09420
Defendant:
D. QUINTERO, M. BRADY, F. LARKIN and others
Plaintiff:
DAVID MILLER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COUNTY OF BUTLER et al v. THOMAS W. WOLF et al
as 2:2020cv00677
Plaintiff:
R.W. MCDONALD & SONS, INC., NANCY GIFFORD, COUNTY OF FAYETTE and others
Defendant:
THOMAS W. WOLF and RACHEL LEVINE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONNER v. THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2020cv00622
Plaintiff:
TYREE BONNER
Defendant:
THE CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICER CHRISTOPHER HULMES and PHILADELPHIA POLICE OFFICERS DOE 1-3
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONNER v. JUSTIA INCORPORATED
as 3:2019cv20135
Defendant:
JUSTIA INCORPORATED
Plaintiff:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv02063
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Andrew Bonner, Jr. v. USA, et al
as 17-1245
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Miller v. M. Brady, et al
as 15-2033
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID A. MILLER
Defendant - Appellee:
M. BRADY, in his official and individual capacities, A. MANTZ, in his official and individual capacities, C. BONNER, in his official and individual capacities and others
BONNER v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv01378
Plaintiff:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES PATENT COMMISSION and U.S. PATENT & TRADEMARK OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BONNER v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2015cv00621
Plaintiff:
ANDREW K. BONNER, JR.
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and UNITED STATES CONGRESS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
