Civil Rights Cases filed in the Third Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Ronnie Todd v. Ryan Todd, et al
as 22-3366
Plaintiff / Appellant: RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant: RYAN RAMAEL TODD, Estate, Beneficiary Ryan Ramael Todd, CHRISTINE RIDLEY, Estate, Beneficiary Christine Ridley, ROONEY TODD, Estate, Beneficiary Rooney Todd and others
Defendant / Appellee: JEROME BLACKWELL, Estate, Beneficiary, ANTHONY BLINKEN, Secretary of State, MARK BRNOVICH, Arizona Attorney General and others
PARKER v. HAALAND et al
as 2:2022cv05049
Plaintiff: JAMAL DARIUS PARKER Moor Beneficiary a Emperor, a Noble a Merchant, Admiral, Piloter, Seaman, Mariner, Shereef in propria persona Sui Juris, majoris aetatis suae d/b/a Jamal El Trust
Defendant: DEBRA ANNE HAALAND d/b/a Debra Anne Haaland, secretary of the interior et al.,, MERRICK BRIAN GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND attorney general et al.,, ANDREW MARSHALL SAUL d/b/a ANDREW SAUL commissioner et al., and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
TODD v. RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE et al
as 2:2022cv04777
Plaintiff: RONNIE RAMAEL TODD
Defendant: RYAN RAMAEL TODD ESTATE, Not Named Graham Estate, CHRISTINE RIDLEY ESTATE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
BROWN et al v. BLINKEN et al
as 2:2022cv04790
Plaintiff: KENNETH ANDERSON BROWN and KB RA-EL EXPRESS TRUST
Defendant: JOHN ANTONY BLINKEN D/B/A ANTONY JOHN BLINKEN, SECRETARY OF STATE, JANET LOUISE YELLEN d/b/a JANET LOUISE YELLEN secretary of treasury, et al. United States HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES, MERRICK GARLAND d/b/a MERRICK GARLAND, et al. attorney general, et al. United States HEIRS AND ASSIGNEES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
A.K.M., et al v. Arlington County Virginia Child Protective Serv, et al
as 22-3112
Plaintiff / Appellant: A. K. M., minor fraternal brothers, by and through GWYNNETH MOOLENAAR, maternal grandmother and next friend, I. R. M., minor fraternal brothers, by and through GWYNNETH MOOLENAAR, maternal grandmother and next friend and GWENNETH MOOLENAAR, As Maternal Grandmother and Next Friend
Defendant / Appellee: ARLINGTON COUNTY VIRGINIA CHID PROTECTIVE SERVICES, GEORGE D. VAROUTSOS, Chief Judge of the Arlington County Juvenile and Domestic Relations, KAREN GRANE, Assistant County Attorney and others
Whaley, Jr. v. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2022cv00987
Plaintiff: George Henry Whaley, Jr.
Defendant: Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania, Clinton County, Pennsylvania, Bryan Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jane Me, et al v. USA, et al
as 22-1981
Plaintiff / Appellant: JANE ME, JANE ME1 and JON ROE
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Defendant: JUDGE LESLEY ADAMS, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge, JUDGE AFFILIATED MANAGEMENT INC, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge, JUDGE MATTHEW ALBENCE, in her personal and official capacity Municipal Court Judge and others
LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION v. UNITED STATES et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2022cv02399
Plaintiff: LAWYERS FOR FAIR RECIPROCAL ADMISSION
Defendant: UNITED STATES, MERICK B GARLAND, CHIEF JUDGE MICHAEL A CHAGARES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LILLEY v. HIRZ et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2021cv00360
Plaintiff: JOHN LILLEY
Defendant: ASSISTANT DA ELIZABETH HIRZ, CHIEF JUDGE MARK HORNAK and ATTORNEY OBERLANDER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
HAHN v. SMITH et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2021cv00637
Plaintiff: PHILIP HAHN
Defendant: CIRCUIT JUDGE PORTER, CIRCUIT JUDGE RESTREPO, CIRCUIT JUDGE BIBAS and others
Petitioner: UNITED STATES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?