Cases 11 - 20 of 48
SLOANE v. BLACK
as 2:2022cv04657
Plaintiff:
Novice Sloane
Defendant:
RACHEL BLACK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
REYELT et al v. MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING
as 2:2022cv06072
Plaintiff:
VICTORIA REYELT and MICHELLE OLIVERI
Defendant:
MEMORIAL SLOAN KETTERING
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Frederick Stampone, et al v. Brittian Amann, et al
as 22-2273
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTA JO STAMPONE, Formerly known as Hieshetter and FREDERICK STAMPONE
Defendant / Appellee:
BRITTIAN AMANN, BENJAMIN AMANN, GRAND RAPIDS FOAM TECHNOLOGIES and others
Defendant:
DONALD J. TRUMP, PAUL L. MALONEY, WILLIAM BARR and others
Plaintiff:
MARTA JO STAMPONE, Formerly known as Hieshetter (Deceased) and MARTA JO STAMPONE, Formerly known as Hieshetter (Deceased) Dismissed per Clerk order dated
DAVIS v. STATE OF NEW JERSEY et al
as 2:2022cv03755
Plaintiff:
CARLENE DAVIS
Defendant:
STATE OF NEW JERSEY, NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, COUNTY OF ESSEX and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv14930
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv13650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv02940
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00095
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2019cv08463
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROY v. SLOAN INSURANCE AGENCY
as 1:2018cv11812
Defendant:
SLOAN INSURANCE AGENCY
Plaintiff:
FRANK ROY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
